Reading through the Miami Herald this morning, I ran across an article about some Cuban students who raised some great questions to Ricardo Alarcón, Cuban Parliament Leader. In cross-checking the facts against a BBC article, it’s safe to say that the control of information is really the only thing keeping the current regime in power there. For instance, students said they understood not being able to access the internet freely (according to the BBC article, the Cuban government blames this on the US Embargo), but that why should that prohibit them from seeing sites not connected to the US, or sites that are internationally used. Specifically, they mentioned Yahoo. Ricardo Alarcón’s answer: “I don’t know what you’re talking about, but I’ll look into it.”
Another valid question from a Cuban student, this one smart enough to evoke the name el Che: Why can’t I travel to Bolivia to see the place where our great leader was struck down? Answer, according to Mr. Ricardo Alarcón: Travel is not a human right–no country defines it as such. He said, If all 6 billion people in the world traveled as they pleased, do you realize the chaos and mayhem that would cause? Only the rich–who have grow that way by immoral means–can afford such luxury. When asked why Cubans can’t stay in Cuban hotels, Ricardo Alarcón’s answer was: If you think it’s bad *now,* you should have been around before Castro cleaned this place up. His point: you wouldn’t have been able to get into that hotel in 1958, either (back then, because you were poor; now, because it is forbidden). And Alarcón didn’t even have an answer as to why Cubans are paid in a currency with 25 times less buying power than the currency in which items are sold. He just left that one alone.
If these young students are brave enough to ask these questions to this official, in public and on camera, then they are smart enough to know his answers are those of an old man grabbing at straws. Let’s just hope these kids don’t end up missing, or worse, with comfy political appointments.
Funny thing: the @ symbol on one young man’s shirt — no mention of it in the BBC report (though you can clearly see it in the video), yet the Miami Herald had a few sentences dedicated to this “silent, visual protest.”